77% Yes |
23% No |
66% Yes |
16% No |
7% Yes, but only after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
7% No, but they should be allowed to refuse artificial life support |
4% Yes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness |
See how support for each position on “Euthanasia” has changed over time for 7.1m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Euthanasia” has changed over time for 7.1m America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@99JGS331yr1Y
Yes, but after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice or if there is NO chance they will survive or fully recover from their illness/disease/disability.
@4PYJFTT4yrs4Y
A law on suicide is as enforceable as a law against masturbation. You simple can't stop a person from doing what they wish to do. If a terminally ill person wishes to end their suffering, who I am I to prevent them.
@4PYMMQ44yrs4Y
This should be extended to all people ill or not. Suicide should be an option everyone has.
@4RHYFBT4yrs4Y
The "right to die" issue really troubles me. I'm afraid if we keep insisting on our right to die, the insurance companies are going to start denying care to chronically and terminally ill parients (who want and and need medical care) based on the enormous costs involved. I foresee a day in the not so distant future where we will be fighting for our "right to live." There will come a day when so-called "Death Panels" decide whether or not we should live or die based on the economic factors involved. This is a very slippery slope.
@4TYPHKL4yrs4Y
Yes and I would even expand it to people with severe Alzheimer's.
@4Q5ZLJH4yrs4Y
All people with diseases or genetic defects should be executed for the good of humanity.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Euthanasia” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to America voters.