In the U.S. a citizen may give $2,700 per election to a federal candidate, $5,000 per year to a PAC, $10,000 per year to a State or local party committee and $33,400 per year to a national party. Citizens and corporations may give unlimited amounts to a Super PAC. A Super PAC is freed from traditional campaign finance laws as long as it does not fund a candidate or campaign or coordinate directly with a campaign how to spend donations.
@ISIDEWITH9yrs9Y
@ISIDEWITH8yrs8Y
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors
@9FBDR3F8mos8MO
In a lot of elections, there have been cans of worms opened about who is donating to who. For example, Trump called Hilary Clinton out about her being a hypocrite to the tax cut policy when he claimed that "you'd be cutting all your donors off." Or something along the lines of that.
@ISIDEWITH8yrs8Y
Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
@9C4MSQH12mos12MO
Greedy CEOs and ruling class people including Deep State and Zionist operatives have hijacked elections since Day 1 and use donations to buy out politicians and make them swear allegiance to the Deep State and the Zionist Lobby instead of the people.
@ISIDEWITH8yrs8Y
No, this is a violation of free speech
@9FBDR3F8mos8MO
You are funding way too much money to the candidate, politicians shouldn't be pressured to impress there primary donors.
This inherently values some (the rich donors) speech more than it does others. If expression of free speech depends on monetary assets, it is not speech at all.
@ISIDEWITH8yrs8Y
No, as long as all donations are public knowledge
@5DVLBZW4yrs4Y
All current regulations hurt all alternatives to the Democratic and Republican Party candidates. The limits the D/R politicians impose on themselves are routinely violated by them, in fact; but are vigorously enforced against people like me. You really should look into this yourself.
@9B5CG66Republican1yr1Y
No, this is a violation of free speech as long as all donations are public knowledge
@igeryuIndependent3yrs3Y
Yes, and all donations should be public record.
@9D3RPBQ10mos10MO
Donors should be only perceived by grassroots sources and sources that are entirely democratic and people oriented
@8PP96SH3yrs3Y
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections
@97KSZBQ2yrs2Y
I think we should increase transparency, allowing everyone to know which interests are supporting which parties and candidates, and to offset the impact of private money with public money.
@8GBN55KIndependent4yrs4Y
Elimination of corporate donations and a limitation to how much individuals may donate. Ban PAC'S.
@9MFX8R73 days3D
There should be no "candidate" for a government where the leader (a king) is either chosen by lottery, or by succession of his firstborn son. Use that money for other more productive things.
@9M7SV59 1wk1W
Yes. Political donations should be illegal. in this age of social media, there is great potential to level the playing field for everyone, not just those with power and money.
@9LDT7ZWIndependent1mo1MO
Yes, a donation limit to a politician should be set at $5,000 for a single individual, group or corporation. The common people they are meant to represent cannot afford to donate more than that so anyone that does exceed that amount is a wealthy person trying to buy power.
@9LC9L271mo1MO
Yes, and require candidates to disclose the amount of money they received and the identity of the donor.
@9LC5YX41mo1MO
There should be no fundraising. We should have a non-partisan systems. Everyone who votes should have to read about the the politicians. Its all a scam.
@9L92TRJ1mo1MO
If the Doner was from a family member or friend it should be for free if optional by the doner to make it easier for everyone
@9L7H98H2mos2MO
Yes, but news and TV stations should be obligated to treat candidates equally and fairly and opportunities to be broadcast.
@9L3PV692mos2MO
people should not be limited. corporations should. people are citizens with constitutional (first amendment) rights. corporations are not.
@9L2XRM52mos2MO
Politicians and their supporters will always find ways around campaign finance laws, Should set a dollar amount for each elected office and no more money can be raise with stricter rules on reporting expenditures.
@9KYDDB92mos2MO
Yes, and both corporations and special interest groups should be barred from making political donations, since corporations are not citizens.
@9KDB59P3mos3MO
No, but I would require each candidate be required to put a graphic by their name on all signs, tv adds, radio adds, that shows where they politically plot on the ISIDEWITH.Com Quiz (blue star) with a ID number so voters can look up their answers. ISIDEWITH would be tasked with ensuring their political voting history matches their quiz. Donators would have their ISIDEWITH graphic shown on the contribution web sites as well.
@9K7PKF93mos3MO
Any donation to a political candidate should be taxed 30%, 30% to the republican/democratic committee, 30% to a congressional bank who will monitor that the money is spent for approved campaign or congressional activities, 10% to the candidate to spend as they wish.
@9K5MYMGIndependent3mos3MO
Yes, but make it so all donations are completely anonymous to everyone even the person receiving the donation so the money cannot influence someone in the government's decision making.
@9J9G6DX4mos4MO
No, but concealing donations for or against a person, party, or policy by washing the money through PAC's should be illegal.
@9J8J2ZPProgressive4mos4MO
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors whether they be industry lobbyists or private citizens.
@9J88MG64mos4MO
No, but there should be a cutoff period after which donations can no longer be accepted prior to any election.
@9J759WY4mos4MO
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. Moreover, all donations should be mandated to be anonymous.
@9J65GLB4mos4MO
Yes, and also publicly fund elections to supplement but not entirely ban individuals from donating up to a set monetary threshold.
@9CNWMJTIndependent 4mos4MO
If it is corporations and unions, then they should not donate at all since such entities are not individuals. I believe there should be a limit on the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to prevent billionaires and millionaires from buying politicians to govern as THEY see fit, not as the candidate sees fit.
@9J24H3WLibertarian 4mos4MO
No but donations should be placed anonymously and dispersed evenly to avoid the persuasion of votes by politicians
@9HZ8SG74mos4MO
All high office election should be limited to a publicly funded amount to ensure equal opportunities
@9HZ8DMDPeace and Freedom4mos4MO
i feel that if it’s over a certain amount that it must go to funding for health care or something else to help others
@9HRGMNT5mos5MO
Yes, and every candidate that meets an endorsement quota should have free and equal publicity time (debates, ads, news coverage)
@9HR7GNT5mos5MO
Yes, make the number $0. Political campaigns are a waste of time and money. They are toxic and divisive to society.
@9HPRL7C5mos5MO
No, but all the PACs and Super PACs should be removed and donation amounts should all be public record.
@9HMCTC9Constitution5mos5MO
Yes, and we should do away with corporations and organizations and special interest donations, only allowing, private donations.
@9HLK9DX5mos5MO
Only private donations, tax deductible within limits. No corporate, union or third party donations allowed
@9HKVHBQ5mos5MO
Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors and wealthy supporters can show their support in other ways
@9HJZMWN5mos5MO
Yes, and only citizens should be able to donate money, remove the employer information, and ban super packs
@9HBZSD46mos6MO
Yes, but limit how much money that Political Action Committees and Super Political Action Committees can donate for a candidate.
@9H3WN7S6mos6MO
If it’s corporate PAC money then yes absolutely. They should not receive any funding from those sources imo
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...